Sources

Attribution & Licences

Everything on this site is built from open data. The vocabulary, the reading texts and the questions derived from them are published under CC BY-SA 4.0, inherited from Wiktionary and Klexikon. If you reuse any of it, keep this attribution reachable.

Where the data comes from

SourceProvidesLicence
Wiktionary via wiktextract Gender, article, plural, genitive, verb principal parts, auxiliary, comparative and superlative, English glosses, IPA, audio links, topic labels, synonyms, antonyms CC BY-SA 4.0
Tatoeba Example sentences, and the corpus counts used to pick each word's primary reading CC BY 2.0 FR
FrequencyWords (OpenSubtitles 2018) The frequency ranking every list on this site is sorted by CC BY-SA 4.0
OpenSubtitles v2024 via OPUS Most example sentences, mined from 65.7 million German–English pairs See note below
Klexikon Every reading text, and the passages the comprehension questions are built on CC BY-SA 4.0
minddory.com The word list and its CEFR level assignments None stated

OpenSubtitles asks that work using the corpus link to opensubtitles.org and cite Lison & Tiedemann (2016), OpenSubtitles2016: Extracting Large Parallel Corpora from Movie and TV Subtitles (LREC). OPUS states that it does not own the underlying text and redistributes only what it believes it may.

Pronunciation audio is linked to Wikimedia Commons, not copied. Individual recordings carry their own licences — check the Commons file page before redistributing a file itself.

Machine-generated content

Three things on this site were written by a language model rather than a person:

They are derivative of the Klexikon passages and the vocabulary examples they were built from, so they inherit CC BY-SA 4.0.

They are machine-written and machine-checked, not reviewed by a teacher. The checks were real ones — comprehension items must quote the passage verbatim; gap-fill items must restore a word that genuinely occurs in the source; every word in a stem or option is checked against the vocabulary list up to that level; and a second model pass answered each item blind with the options already shuffled, with disagreements dropped rather than kept. But automated checks are not the same as review. Sample before putting any of it in front of learners, and treat anything that looks wrong as possibly wrong.

Known limitations

Reusing this material

CC BY-SA 4.0 lets you copy, adapt and redistribute all of it, including commercially, on two conditions: credit the sources above, and license what you build under the same terms. A link back to this page satisfies the attribution requirement.